Immigration Public date: 26.04.2021 01:40:19

5 May 2018

Immigrants Are Founding a Quarter of New Businesses in the United States : Immigration Impact

Immigrants create about 25 percent of new businesses in the nation (those five years old or less), while the immigrant share exceeds 40 percent of new firms in California, New York, New Jersey, and Florida.
Immigrants create about 25 percent of new businesses in the nation (those five years old or less), while the immigrant...
11 Mar 2018

Immigrants Fuel Job Gains, Not Losses in the United States

Immigrants are often used as scapegoats for those feeling the economic pinch of joblessness. However, for the last 15 years, immigrants have not been a source of significant job competition for the native-born in the United States. In fact, immigrants have not contributed to job loss in the United States since 1999.
Immigrants are often used as scapegoats for those feeling the economic pinch of joblessness. However, for the last 15...
8 Oct 2017

FAIR Miscalculates the Cost of Unauthorized Immigration In A New Study : Immigration Impact

The anti-immigrant organization Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) has released a report which attempts to make the case that undocumented immigrants in the United States impose a massive fiscal burden on native-born Americans. This is a baseless argument that FAIR makes repeatedly, and it rests upon a number of flawed assumptions about the impact ...
The anti-immigrant organization Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) has released a report which attempts...
Tags:
1 Oct 2017

DHS Wants to Monitor Immigrants’ Social Media. No One Knows What They Will Do With This Information : Immigration Impact

DHS announced that it will begin gathering the social media of all immigrants in the country—even green card holders and naturalized U.S. citizens.
DHS announced that it will begin gathering the social media of all immigrants in the country—even green card holders...
15 May 2016

Report on Immigrant Welfare Use is Fundamentally Flawed–Here’s Why

The biggest shortcoming of both reports is that they count the public benefits utilized by U.S.-born children as costs incurred by the "immigrant-headed households" of which they are a part, at least until those children turn 18, that is, at which point they are counted as natives. The problem with this kind of creative accounting is that all children are 'costly' when they are young because they consume educational and health services without contributing any tax revenue. However, that situation reverses when they are working-age adults who, in a sense, 'pay back' in taxes what they consumed as children. So it is disingenuous to count them as a 'cost of immigration' one minute, and then as native-born taxpayers the next minute.
The biggest shortcoming of both reports is that they count the public benefits utilized by U.S.-born children as costs...
Tags:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *